Manic Expression

Blog Post New Entry

STOP THE HATE #152 - Doctor Who...Reboot or No?

Posted by James on May 8, 2012 at 11:20 AM

Doctor Who is going Hollywood...and I don’t know how I feel about that.

It was recently announced that Harry Potter director David Yates will be bringing the Doctor and his TARDIS to the big screen in a giant, epic film that will pay no never mind to the 50 years of continuity the British series has under its belt. ...I just don’t know how to feel about that, I really don’t.

First, my history with the Doctor: Its only a month or so old. As I’ve said before, I got rid of cable and have been relying on downloads and Netflix for my nightly television fix (a much cheaper solution, I might add). In the year and a half I’ve had my PS3 I’ve burned through one television series after another: 30 Rock, Lost, Buffy, Twin Peaks, Heroes. Now I’m on to Doctor Who. I’m only halfway through the show (and I should point out, I started off with where the series picks up in 2005). David Tennant is still the Doctor for me, I haven’t even made it to Matt Smith yet. So I am in no way an expert on this show.


However, I can say that Doctor Who has charmed the hell out of me. Compared to what I’m used to in my science fiction - fist fights, laser guns, battles to the death - the Doctor is a breath of fresh air. He’s a pacifist. I don’t think I’ve ever seen him throw a punch. That I can remember he’s only wielded a weapon once. He’s a man of action, but he values life in all its forms.

I knew, going in, that Christopher Eccleston would not be the Doctor forever, but I didn’t know his run was so brief. I’d grown quite fond of his mugging one second, brooding the next performance. When David Tennant took his place, I was resistant. I didn’t want to like him at first. Now, as I’m nearing the end of his run, it breaks my heart to think of him going away. Tennant’s portrayal of the Doctor is easily one of the most charming performances I’ve ever seen an actor give.

Yates’ plan, to bring the Doctor into the world of film, does not include Matt Smith. Many are outraged at this, but as I’ve not seen Smith’s performance yet I can’t comment. However, I think dumping continuity should always be the last resort. What choice did Christopher Nolan have with Batman? Was there really anywhere else to go with James Bond? Hitting the reset button is something you shouldn’t do unless there is absolutely no way to continue a franchise that’s been run into the ground.

I suppose David Yates is looking to JJ Abrams Star Trek film as some sort of inspiration. After all, Star Trek is sort of the American Doctor Who. The Enterprise has been sailing the galaxies about as long as the TARDIS. They are both beloved sci-fi staples that promote peace and understanding. Perhaps Captain Kirk is more likely to take a life than the good Doctor, but they are both, at heart, explorers who long to find peaceful resolutions to conflict.

However, Abrams' Star Trek film was not a reboot. Despite what many fans claim, he did not hit the reset button. Oh, he did, but in a way that acknowledged everything that came before. The presence of Leonard Nimoy and the acknowledgment that the time line had been reset made 2009’s Star Trek a sequel, not a reboot. Spock still died and was resurrected, Captain Picard still took over the helm. Hell, there are even still Tribbles in Star Trek’s past. I can’t think of any way to better honor the legacy of Gene Roddenberry than to reboot the universe instead of rebooting the franchise.

Personally, here’s what I’d like to see happen with David Yate’s Doctor Who. Let the BBC steer the next season toward gearing up for the film. In the films opening scene, bring back Matt Smith. Open the movie with his death and resurrection as the next Doctor...the movie Doctor. In a perfect world the show would continue as well, with this new fella playing the twelfth and final Doctor. Set up a trilogy of films to be released every few years, have the schedule of the show revolve around filming of the movies. When the final film is released, the Doctor dies for the last time, sacrifices himself to save the universe. Before he dies, he looks into the camera with that cheeky grin that every Doctor’s had. He gives us a wink and he says, “You were fantastic.” ... Let him rest for a decade or more, and only then hit the reset button.

I think there’s potential for a big, $200 million Doctor Who movie, so long as they don’t lose sight of what makes the character so wonderful. Don’t put a gun in his hand. Don’t have him kill his enemies with a smile and a quip on his lips. Have some courage and portray the Doctor as a man of peace, a desperately lonely explorer lost in a sea of stars, none of which he belongs to. If they do that, I’ll be there opening day.

Categories: STOP THE HATE, Movies & TV, Thoughts

Post a Comment

Oops!

Oops, you forgot something.

Oops!

The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.

You must be a member to comment on this page. Sign In or Register

10 Comments

Reply Daiul
08:55 PM on May 08, 2012 
I would only trust this film if Russell T. Davies was involved with it in some way. Yates does nothing but make me antcipate the film failing and doing so hard; the Harry Potter films under his touch are a mess (with potential exception of Deatlhy Hallows 1 and 2 which I am yet to watch).
Reply Ratin8tor
04:52 PM on May 08, 2012 
HOWEVER I think a Doctor Who movie could work... if they have NO connection to the TV Series.

Shocking I know (and I'm the biggest Doctor Who fan out there), but hear me out.

The thing is, they've already made a Dr Who movie for the cinema. 2 in fact. Both based around the first two Dalek stories.

Sure the contunity is messed up (the Doctor being human, suddenly having two daughters, the TARDIS not being what it's meant to be), but as films they're brilliant. Once you remove from your head how this is meant to fit in with the TV series, you get to see some awesome Dalek extermination action. Invasion Earth 2150 AD is still one of my favourite movies because of how much bigger it is then the TV episodes it was based on.

So yeah, you could make a movie about Doctor Who. A completely new reboot, in the same way Casino Royale is a reboot. You can have no connection to the TV series, keeping only some of the elements. Hell just come up with all new elements, like a new movie monster that can't be realised on a TV budget. Or something majestic and awe-inspiring.

However trying to tie it into Doctor Who would fail miserably. The Doctor has, and always will be, on TV. It is a TV show, that's the point. The character of the Doctor would fail in film because he's not that interesting of a hero. He doesn't use violence, but only his brains. And while you can get away with that in a TV show, it'd flop at the movies. Why? Because audience members would be going to watch dumb sci-fi/action fics, not interesting characters using their brains to get out of situations. Most audience members won't appreciate it.

So while I'll love to see the Doctor on the big screen, it won't fundementally work for the same reason The Avengers (british version) didn't work. You can't take a TV show and turn it into a movie. Not well at least.

Still, good blog, it was fun to read :D
Reply Ratin8tor
04:45 PM on May 08, 2012 
LOL I love the idea about "killing Matt Smith and having him regenerate on-screen into the movie doctor"... because that's the exact reason why the TV movie is so, so bad.

Basically they got Sylvester McCoy (7th Doctor) to be shot on screen by gangsters and regenerate into the Paul McGann (8th Doctor). Now in theory this seems great, contining on the series.

... Except that 2/3rds of the film was dedicated just to the regeneration, giving the brilliant Paul McGann bugger all to do. It takes a good 45 mins just for the plot to actually start going; and just when it gets good it's all over.

It's precisly the reason why there's no 8/9 regeneration. Imagine you sat down, watched the first ep of new who, only to see Paul McGann shot in 5 minutes. That'd confuse the eff out of you. It'd ruin the whole experience.

So yeah, I love the idea of getting matt to regenerate on screen solely because how they tried that and failed miserably lol
Reply Jim Bevan
04:44 PM on May 08, 2012 
If they do make a Doctor who movie, I want to see a Doctor in the vein of Jon Pertwee's portrayal. Suave, intelligent, sophisticated, and not afraid to get his hands dirty if needed. I know people go gaga over Eccleston, Tennant and Smith, but I don't think they really compare to the classic incarnations. At least, that's my opinion.

An alternate timeline/universe wouldn't be such a bad idea, either. Maybe incorporate a theme from the classic series, and rework it into a feature-length concept. Like the Dalek Invasion of Earth, or the Key to Time saga.
Reply Fluffyman
04:10 PM on May 08, 2012 
I think this is pretty pointless considering unlike Abrams' "Star Trek" the series will still be running alongside, and the current variation is a relaunch in some ways itself though at the same time still a continuation. Do Who-fans really care for an alternate continuity only reserved for the films?
Reply Gurning Chimp
03:34 PM on May 08, 2012 
Like many others here I think that this movie will be an out of continuity experience like the Peter Cushing films. If Hollywood are left in charge, then yes, expect a balls up. Also if they bring back David Tennant, I won't be happy either. I hated his portrayal of The Doctor.

The James Bond films HAD to be rebooted after Die Another Day to be fair. God I hate that movie.
Reply jashykins
01:16 PM on May 08, 2012 
I think they'll mess it up a lot. But I'll see the final product before going on a killing rampage :)
Reply BigBlackHatMan
12:14 PM on May 08, 2012 
I have no experience with Dr. Who I admit, so a reboot is about the only thing that would convince someone like me to go to the movie. The movie will have to appeal to a large audience, but they should have some service for the true fans. Good work
Reply Chris Lang
12:05 PM on May 08, 2012 
I tend to agree with you about reboots. Unless the franchise has been thoroughly run into the ground, you shouldn't do them. That's why the Spider-Man movie reboot annoyed me because I didn't think there was nowhere else for the Sam Raimi movies to go. (The Spider-Man comics, on the other hand, are another story. Marvel ran THAT franchise into the ground in the mid-to-late 90s, but they continue to beat the dead horse because they don't like reboots. But that's a subject for another blog entry).

Incidentally, waaay back during the early days of Dr. Who, there were two Dr. Who movies released that were not 'in continuity' with the series. These starred Peter Cushing as the Doctor, and were loosely based on two early Dr. Who stories 'The Daleks' and 'The Dalek Invasion of Earth'. There were also a few changes made to both the stories and the premise.

I've been out of the loop, so I don't know if this movie is an 'out of continuity' thing like the above-mentioned movies, a 'reboot', or something different.
Reply Oliver Judd
11:50 AM on May 08, 2012 
Personally I don't mind how they do it, just so long as it stays true to the source material. They already did a Doctor Who movie (several, actually) starring Paul McGann (the 8th Doctor), and you pretty much described its premise. It starts off with Sylvester McCoy, the previous Doctor, regenerating into McGann. I liked it but a lot of peole didn't, lol

Categories

Recent Videos

5 views - 0 comments
17 views - 1 comment


TLHCG's Push Comes To Shove


Subscribe to the Community!

Follow Us

Webs Counter